Sakya Paṇḍita Kunga Gyeltsen

Kunga Gyeltsen became a close disciple of the Kashmiri teacher Śākyaśrībhadra (1140-1225) and also studied under the Indian masters Saṅghaśrī, Danasīla, and Sugataśrī. He took full ordination with Śākyaśrībhadra in 1208, who trained him in the entire span of monastic education then current in the great monasteries of India, including Abhidharma, Vinaya, Prajñāpāramitā, Madhyamaka, logic and epistemology, grammar and poetics. Based on this education he was instrumental in transmitting the Indian system of five major and five minor sciences to Tibet.  Sakya Paṇḍita was known as a formidable philosophical debate in both formal public arenas and in writing. In 1240 he traveled to Kyirong where he famously debated and defeated the Indian scholar Harinanda. His compositions refuting doctrinal positions of the Kagyu and Nyingma traditions continue to exert considerable influence. He authored more than one hundred texts and was also a prolific translator from Sanskrit. His major works include Tshad ma rigs pa’i gter (Treasury of Epistemology) Sdom gsum rab dbye (Clear Differentiation of the Three Vows), Thub pa dgongs pa rab gsal (Clarifying the Sage’s Intentions), Legs par bshad pa rin pa che’i gter (Treasury of Aphoristic Jewels), and Mkhas pa rnam ‘jug pa’i sgo (Entrance Gate for the Wise). His writings are among the most widely influential in Tibetan literature and prompted commentaries by countless subsequent authors. He taught widely and became renowned across Tibet for his scholarship and skill in teaching.  In 1244 Sakya Paṇḍita received an invitation to the court of the Koden Khan, the son of the supreme Mongolian leader Ogodei and the Khan in charge of the regions of the Mongolian Empire that bordered on Tibet. Mongolian contact with Tibetan lamas had most likely begun with Chinggis Khan’s conquest of Tangut kingdom of Xixia in 1227, and deepened with his successors’ invasions of Sichuan and Yunnan regions. In 1240 Koden had sent a reconnaissance mission to Tibet to locate authorities who could submit on behalf of Tibet. Finding only large monasteries and family estates headed by charismatic lamas (ordained or not), the Mongolians logically established relations with lamas. Although these relations were almost certainly political in nature, Tibetan histories, which foreground the religious motivations of the Mongolians in inviting lamas to their courts cannot be entirely discounted, as many members of the ruling families were apparently quite devout.  Sapaṇ, then aged sixty-three, made the journey to meet Koden at Liangzhou, in the Kokonor region. With him he brought his two nephews, the sons of his brother Sonam Gyeltsen (1184-1239). The two young men, Pakpa Lodro Gyeltsen 1235-1280) and Chana Dorje (1239-1267), both later played important parts in the history of Tibet, Mongolia, and China. The journey took nearly three years since Sapaṇ stopped at various locations to give Buddhist teachings en route.    Sakya Paṇḍita reached Kodan’s camp in 1246, meeting with Koden the following year. Sapaṇ purportedly provided a treatment that cured the Khan’s skin disease, possibly leprosy, which put him especially good standing with the Mongols. Sapaṇ aided his nephew Pakpa in developing a script (called the Pakpa script) for Mongolian, which was previously written in Uighur. Although they were not the only Tibetans present, and shared the religious stage with Christians, Muslims, and Chinese of various traditions, Sapaṇ and his nephews’ presence at the court was a key factor in the establishment of Buddhism in Mongolia, and he successfully converted many members of the ruling house.  According to Tibetan histories, in 1249 Koden appointed Sapaṇ as temporal ruler of Tibet, although this likely meant very little in terms of real power. Sakya Paṇḍita is said to have sent a letter to other leaders in Tibet urging them to submit to Mongol rule and pay tribute, but the letter seems to have been largely ignored. Nevertheless, Sakya Paṇḍita’s relationship with Koden is often cited as a model for the later development of the so-called priest-patron (mchod-yon) relationship between Tibet and its more militarily powerful neighbors, most famously embodied by his nephew Pakpa and Khubilai Khan at the start of the Yuan Dynasty. Sapaṇ’s ventures in Mongolian power also helped lay the ground for the long standing tradition of linking Buddhist authority and political rule in Tibet. Sapaṇ died in Liangzhou in 1251.

Source: https://treasuryoflives.org

Author: Professor, Dominique Townsend.